"SfR Fresh" - the SfR Freeware/Shareware Archive

Member "ocs-2.1.0-1/help/en_US/editorial/topic/000000.xml" of archive ocs-2.1.0-1.tar.gz:

As a special service "SfR Fresh" has tried to format the requested source page into HTML format using (guessed) XML source code syntax highlighting with prefixed line numbers. Alternatively you can here view or download the uninterpreted source code file. That can be also achieved for any archive member file by clicking within an archive contents listing on the first character of the file(path) respectively on the according byte size field. 
    1 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    2 <!DOCTYPE topic SYSTEM "../../../topic.dtd">
    3 
    4 <!--
    5   * 000000.xml
    6   *
    7   * Copyright (c) 2000-2008 John Willinsky
    8   * Distributed under the GNU GPL v2. For full terms see the file docs/COPYING.
    9   *
   10   * Editorial Process Index
   11   *
   12   * $Id: 000000.xml,v 1.7 2008/05/22 14:58:40 asmecher Exp $
   13   -->
   14 
   15 <topic id="editorial/topic/000000" locale="en_US" title="Editorial Process" toc="index/toc/000000" subtoc="editorial/toc/000000" key="editorial.index">
   16 	<section>
   17 		<![CDATA[<p>The Editorial Process for a conference submission consists of three steps: the initial submission, which moves to review, and then to editing.</p>
   18 
   19 		<p>If a presentation is submitted to a track with no assigned Track Directors, it appears in the Director's Unassigned queue, and must be assigned to a Track Director or Director to move to the Review queue. If the track does have a Track Director assigned to it, the submission will appear in the Review queue with that Track Director automatically assigned.</p>
   20 
   21 		<p>Once the peer review process is complete, the Track Director must make one of the following decisions: to accept the submission, at which point the Complete button can also be clicked (this will move the presentation into the Presentations list under the Conference Information listing, and will allow the presentation to be scheduled); to request revisions, whereby the Author must upload a new version of the submission (and, optionally, the submission can enter another round of review); or to decline the submission, after which point the Track Director should also archive the submission to remove it from the active queues completely. This review process can occur for both an abstract or a presentation, or both, depending on the scheduled conference setup.</p>
   22 		<p>The Track Director can also create, edit and upload one or more galley files to appear on the conference website.</p>]]>
   23 	</section>
   24 </topic>